You are viewing our old site. See the new one here
|
The
fifth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) for the Convention to
Combat Desertification Geneva, Switzerland, 1-12 October 2001 |
|||
|
|
Presenting on synergy among the Conventions, Venkatt Ramnaya (YFA) and
Yves Corriveau (SCS)
stressed the need for synergy at international, regional and local
levels, demonstrated what has already been achieved by local
organizations in attaining a holistic approach and concluded: NGO
involvement in current and future CCD work on synergy among the
conventions; that the CCD should address concerns arising from other
non-Rio multilateral processes such as WTO; and the development of
indicators and benchmarks to monitor CSO involvement in the NAPs
Maryam Niamir-Fuller, UNDP - GEF, underlined the role of the GEF as the single most important provider of support for global environmental concerns, but highlighted constraints in implementing enabling activities, including, inter alia: lack of adequate capacity at country-level; unrealistic timetables for project implementation; and lack of participation mechanisms
Drafting of the report to the Conference of the Parties: The CST met in the morning to conclude adoption of draft decisions for the COP. Discussion addressed the programme of work of the CST, the programme of work for the group of experts, and benchmarks and indicators
On the programme of work of the CST, the EU proposed language to clarify the content of Parties' submissions on best practices, and language to limit the number of intersessional CST Bureau meetings for planning and organizational purposes. CANADA proposed the invitation of reports on innovative research.
On the programme of work for the group of experts, delegates debated the role of regional groups in forwarding Parties' recommendations for consideration by the CST Bureau. SENEGAL proposed that regional or subregional groups synthesize Parties' recommendations for submission to the Secretariat. The US, supported by SWITZERLAND and CANADA, proposed that parties submit directly to the Secretariat to accelerate the process and obtain the broadest possible range of proposals. Incorporating concerns of ERITREA that certain parties would benefit from regional group support, and those of BELGIUM anticipating difficulties in reaching agreement on synthesis within a region, it was decided to adopt a proposal by MOROCCO, with minor changes, so that submissions be solicited from both country parties and relevant organizationsAD HOC Group of Experts on legal matters (AHGE): Noting the approach and Patrick Szell (UK), Chair of the contact group that considered this issue, presented its draft decision on the resolution of the questions of implementation and on arbitration and conciliation procedures, which was adopted ad referendum
Report of the COW: COW Chair Mohammed Jebbari (Iran) reported on the progress of the COW, noting that five meetings had been held to discuss review of implementation. On the Programme and Budget contact group established under the COW, he said no significant progress had been made and that the group will meet again to clarify outstanding issues. On the progress of the review of implementation contact group, CRIC Chair Franklin Moore (US), noted that delegate's views were being compiled into a bracketed/alternative text, with the hope of moving forward with negotiations. Two additional CRIC meetings are scheduled for the weekend
Report on the Global Mechanism: GM Managing Director Per Rydén stressed that the GM needs more financial and human resources to fulfill its growing tasks, which includes: collecting and disseminating information; promoting actions leading to cooperation and coordination; and mobilizing and channeling financial resources. He added that the GM is working to create opportunities with the donor Parties, governments and other partnerships. Welcoming calls for land degradation to become a GEF focal area, he said the GM would assist countries in accessing funds for GEF projects. He also suggested conducting an independent external review of the GM's operational strategy and work for the COP-6 GM review
Report of the CST: Chair Brown said the CST elected its bureau and established a contact group to consider the Annex on the synthesis of the report on ways to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the CST aimed at assisting CST decision-making, and another on the CST's future work. The draft decisions the CST adopted for transmission to the COP are: survey and evaluation of existing networks, institutions, agencies and bodies; roster of independent experts; review and implementation of scientific and technological aspects of national reports; traditional knowledge; early warning systems; dryland degradation assessment (LADA) and the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the CST; future programme of work of the CST; programme of work for the group of experts; and benchmarks and indicators
The US, noted with regret shared by SWITZERLAND and others that the CST body would be unable to fully debate this matter, proposed empowering the CST Bureau to independently develop a programme of work on a one-time basis. Noting historical precedents, the US further proposed, with the support of NORWAY and FRANCE, that the group of experts operate without terms of reference for the time being
Drafting of the Report to the Conference of the Parties: The CST met in the morning to conclude adoption of draft decisions for the COP. Discussion addressed the programme of work of the CST, the programme of work for the group of experts, and benchmarks and indicators
On the programme of work of the CST, the EU proposed language to clarify the content of Parties' submissions on best practices, and language to limit the number of intersessional CST Bureau meetings for planning and organizational purposes. CANADA proposed the invitation of reports on innovative research
On the programme of work for the group of experts, delegates debated the role of regional groups in forwarding Parties' recommendations for consideration by the CST Bureau. SENEGAL proposed that regional or subregional groups synthesize Parties' recommendations for submission to the Secretariat. The US, supported by SWITZERLAND and CANADA, proposed that parties submit directly to the Secretariat to accelerate the process and obtain the broadest possible range of proposals
|
|
© 2001, Earth Negotiations Bulletin. All rights reserved. |
|