ENB:04:44
[
Next] .
[
Previous] .
[
Contents]
CATEGORIES OF COUNTRIES:
The issue of categories of
countries, particularly the references to "other countries in a
position to provide assistance" and "affected [developing]
countries [needing assistance]," has given rise to a clear division
between developed countries. Malaysia, Brazil, China and other
Latin American and Asian countries firmly opposed this "so-called
new category," arguing that it was inappropriate for the North to
direct the manner and scope of "South-South cooperation." The
African Group initially supported this new category, but the G-77
and China position prevailed. The OECD countries argued throughout
this session that new forms of partnership and cooperation are
necessary to effectively combat the problem of desertification.
They called on developing countries with relevant technical
expertise and know-how to provide technical assistance to the least
developing countries. In the end, it was decided that the matter
would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Notwithstanding, the
G-77 and China resolved that they should adhere to the two
categories identified by UNCED -- developed and developing
countries.
To further complicate matters, the US refused to use the phrase
"affected developing country Parties," preferring instead the more
general "affected country Parties needing assistance." The
rationale for this position is that not all the countries suffering
from desertification are developing ones and some of these
non-developing countries, such as the countries with economies in
transition and even some developed countries, may require some form
of technical or financial assistance to combat desertification.
Regardless of how these definitional problems are resolved, the
resulting compromise will not resolve the more substantive and
complicated issues underlying this particular debate -- the need to
evolve the conventional international cooperation model.
[Return to start of article]