You are viewing our old site. See the new one here
|
|
Late-breaking news: Tuesday 10 NovUpdates brought to you by the ENB team members throughout the day:
|
![]() |
![]() |
SBI FINAL SESSION: Parties exchanges during a debate on a report from a contact group on Implementation of UNFCCC Articles 4.8 and 4.9 (decision 3/CP.2 and Articles 2.3 and 3.14 of the Kyoto Protocol)
At the final session of the Subsidiary Body on Implementation at COP-4 on adverse impacts from climate change responses, the US, supported by the EU, reported that no consensus had been reached on a text prepared by the Co-Chairs of a Contact Group dealing with the issue. The EU called for further consultation and added that a decision on a financial mechanism should be reflected in the report to the COP Plenary. Saudi Arabia expressed disappointment and reserved the right to open all the draft decisions. Chair Kante appealed to Parties to draw back from "taking hostages".
The Chair of the contact group, Bo Kjellén, explained that the co-chairs report was subject to further consultation. He added that discussions were linked to many different issues in parallel negotiations in other groups. Agreement would be linked to what could be achieved in other negotiations. Chair Kante said the Contact Groups text would be transmitted to the COP Plenary in square brackets.
Real Audio interventions from the final SBI session by:![]() |
|
![]() |
Exchanges on the negotiated text from the Contact Group on national communications from non-Annex I Parties
The Netherlands, for the EU, sought to introduce a new paragraph to a negotiated text introduced by the Co-Chairs of a Contact Group on national communications from non-Annex I Parties. The G-77/China responded by placing the entire draft decision in brackets. The Chair told the EU that the SBI had agreed that no new text could be added. Parties could add only brackets. The EU explained that his additional text was related to an agenda item which would come up under a later agenda item. The EU opted to bracket a related paragraph (No.6). The Chair consulted with the EU and the G-77/China but failed to get agreement. Kante described the EUs approach as unacceptable and said the delegation was placing the work of the Contact Group in jeopardy. The entire text was sent to the COP Plenary in brackets.
Real Audio interventions from:
![]() |
![]() |
Celebrated Argentinian commentator Miguel Grinberg talks to the ENB
Award winning Argentine columnist and environmental commentator, Miguel
Grinberg, puts the climate change negotiations in perspective in an interview with Peter
Doran. Grinberg has recently described some official attempts to address sustainable
development issues at the official level as "simulated negotiation." He is also
concerned about the captivation of consumers in the southern hemisphere by consumer models and lifestyle models
disseminated by the United States, Europe and Japan.
Right: Peter Doran, ENB, talks to Miguel Grinberg, UNEP Global 500 Prize winner.
Left: Undersecretary of State
Stuart Eisenstat
RealAudio recordings from the briefing:
Eizenstat responds to a question about when the US can be expected to sign the Kyoto Protocol
Martin Bartenstein outlines the EU's position and views
Ritt Bjerregaard elaborates on some of the points raised.
The two representatives answer questions from the floor relating to nuclear power generation and the EU's relationship with the G77/China.
![]() |
![]() |
© Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 1998. All rights reserved.