|
|
Issue
#5 from SB-12, 12-16 June, Bonn
|
Saturday
Edition, 16 June 2000 |
|
Title: Industry view of renewable energy and the CDM
Sponsors:
European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) and the European
Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA)
Contact: Vicky Pollard, EWEA, (ewea@ewea.org),
and Dr. Murray Cameron, EPIA , (epia@epia.org)
Internet: www.ewea.org and www.epia.org
Vicky
Pollard, EWEA, and Dr. Murray Cameron, EPIA, presented a view
on the CDM from the perspective of the renewable energy
industry. The session was chaired by Mahendra Kumar, South
Pacific Regional Environment Programme.Pollard
noted that the basic characteristics of wind energy make it a
good candidate for the CDM. Wind energy, she noted, is
pollution free, uses a inexhaustible energy source, is well
suited for technology transfer, and is easily installed in
remote areas. In addition, wind energy generates income and
creates local jobs. The market for wind energy projects in
Europe has experienced an annual growth rate of approximately
forty percent, and much of this growth has been stimulated by
targeted renewable energy policy measures. In addition, the
economics of producing wind energy have improved as the
production size of wind turbines has increased. Pollard
explained that while the OECD market for wind energy has been
largely driven by environmental considerations, many
developing countries are facing capacity shortage and
regularly depend on imported electricity to meet their demand.
She argued that the CDM would stimulate investment in wind
energy in those countries, and that wind energy should be
included in a positive list under the CDM. To this end the
EWEA is actively lobbying the European Union. |
|
The
market for photovoltaics (PV) in Europe has also grown at an
annual rate of forty per cent, according to Cameron. This
growth rate is equal to the annual growth in the telecom
industry. He emphasized that the PV industry includes several
large players, some of which are located in developing
countries such as India and China. Studies show that it is
more economic to install stand-alone PV systems in remote
rural areas than to connect them to the regular
electricity grid. He also advocated the inclusion of
stand-alone technologies in a positive list under the CDM, and
argued that such a list should be exclusive, at least in the
initial phase.
Discussion:
The ensuing discussion focused on the storage of electricity,
maintenance, user training, and finance schedules, cooperation
with counterparts in the United States, and a European
conference on renewables to be held in October 2000. One
participant noted that a positive list is also required for
Annex I countries because technologies included in such a list
are intended to produce a net reduction of CO2
emissions. One NGO representative advocated the inclusion of
cogeneration in a positive list. |
|
Title: Join the international NEU-CO2 network and use the
NEAT model (Getting rid of errors in inventories for the
petrochemical sector)
Sponsor: European
Commission (DG RTD)
Contact: Dr.
Martin Patel, Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation
Research (ISI) (martin.patel@isi.fhg.de)
Internet: www.eu.fhg.de/NENERGY/
With
support from the European Commission, the NEU-CO2 network
has been working on uncertainties and knowledge gaps in data
on CO2 emissions from the petrochemical industry
and its products. The research is being funded by the EC's
European Network for Research in Global Change (ENRICH), which
enhances networking between European researchers and their
international colleagues, linking past, ongoing or planned
research activities. Julia Kunderman, Research Directorate
General, introduced the ENRICH research programme elements,
including the Key Action Global Change, Climate and
Biodiversity.Patel
explained that a significant amount of fossil fuels is
consumed for the production of petro-chemicals and other
synthetic organic materials, e.g. plastics, paints, solvents,
lubricants and bitumen. A lot of uncertainty exists regarding
the CO2 emissions related to the petrochemical
industry and its products. In many cases the current inventory
guidelines propose the use of default values, which, given the
available statistical data and the structure of the
petrochemical industry, are inadequate. |
|
To
counter some of these uncertainties, the NEU-CO2 network
is developing the NEAT model to generate insights into the
release of CO2 emissions from petrochemicals. The
network has already contributed to improvements in the annual
IEA/EUROSTAT energy balance questionnaire regarding the
harmonization of data on non-energy use.
The
network plans to:
· Expand
the existing network and intensify the exchanges among
partners;
· Use
the network's understanding of the non-energy use of fuels
and the NEAT model to improve the reporting of CO2 emissions
required by the FCCC Common Reporting Format and the IPCC
Guidelines;
· Test
the applicability of the NEAT model for predicting future
trends;
· Provide
recommendations on strategies for reducing CO2 related
to non-energy use;
· And
disseminate results.
Discussion: During
exchanges with participants, including industry, IPCC and FCCC
Secretariat representatives, Patel responded to questions on: new network candidates in Japan and the United States; the quality of industry data available from consultants; the
willingness of the Parties to adopt new methodologies, given
their likely desire to maintain consistency and simplicity in
data collection methods; the flexibility of IPCC Guidelines
for inventories and the current weakness of those Guidelines
in addressing emissions from products; the IPCC's
preparations to review its 1996 Guidelines; and informal
contact between the IPCC and the NEU-CO2 network.
More information:
European
Commission research: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/rtdinfo.html |
|
Title: Top-down emission baselines: a case study (Estonia)
Sponsors:
Swedish delegation, Swedish National Energy Administration (SNEA)
in collaboration with the Stockholm Environment Institute,
Tallinn (SEI)
Contact:
Tiit Kallaste, SEI (tiit@seit.ee)
Internet:
SNEA: www.stem.se SEI: www.seit.ee
Bo
Kjellén, head of the Swedish delegation, welcomed
participants and commented on the importance his government
attaches to emission baselines and the need to share
Sweden's experience with other countries. The first
presenter was Jürgen Salay of the Swedish National Energy
Administration, which has been responsible for the Swedish
Government Programme for Activities Implemented Jointly in the
Baltic Sea Region and Eastern Europe. The programme served as
Sweden's contribution to the AIJ pilot phase. More than
fifty AIJ projects have been implemented and reported to the
FCCC. The programme has focused on renewable fuels, boiler
conversion in the district heating sector, energy efficiency
in buildings, and landfill gas. He concluded that the keys to
success are quick implementation, reliable technology,
flexibility, affordable investment costs, cost efficiency and
partnership. The simplification of preparation and monitoring
of AIJ projects has been part of SNEA's work. Tiit Kallaste,
SEI, presented the findings of the report, "Top-down CO2
Emission Baselines for the Estonian District Heating
Sector." |
|
He
explained that an important part of the methodological work
has been to examine possible ways to construct standardized CO2
emission baselines for various project types.The
objective of the Report was to examine different ways of
standardizing baselines for AIJ or JI projects in the district
heating sector in Estonia. One of the conclusions was that
significant changes in a country's economic development
should be considered when constructing emission baselines. It
is hoped that the Report will contribute to the current
discussion on baseline methods within the framework of the
FCCC and the Kyoto Protocol.
Discussion:
The discussion focused on the use of GDP to calculate a
baseline, using
renewable energy to achieve sustainable development, and the
success of the emission reductions achieved through boiler
conversion. Some participants suggested that the proposed
top-down emissions approach is a hybrid of the top-down and
benchmarking approaches. |
|
|
The Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB) on the side is a special publication of
the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) in
cooperation with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat. The Editor of ENB on the side is
Peter Doran Ph.D <peter@iisd.org>. This issue has been written
by Hernan Lopez <hlopez@law.pace.edu> and Gerhard Mulder <gerhardmulder@hotmail.com
>. The Digital Editor is David Fernau <david@iisd.org>.
Photos by Kenneth Tong <ken@iisd.org> and Andrei Henry <andrei@iisd.org>.
Funding for publication of ENB on the side at SB-12 is
provided by the UNFCCC Secretariat. The opinions expressed in ENB
on the side are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the views of IISD and other funders. Excerpts from ENB on
the side may be used in non-commercial publications only and
only with appropriate academic citation. For permission to use this
material in commercial publications, contact the Managing Editor at
<kimo@iisd.org>. Electronic versions of these issues of ENB
on the side from SB-12 can be found on the Linkages WWW server
at http://enb.iisd.org/climate/sb12/. |
|