You are viewing our old site. See the new one here
Is This Debate Relevant to Low-Income People?
Conference participants recognized the need to help and encourage people in the developing world to achieve material gain along a sustainable path. Discussions at this conference dwelt, however, on America's equity conundrum. How can one reconcile the excessive material consumption in America with the parallel fact that millions of poor and low-income people in America experience great poverty and suffering?
Conference participants addressed some of these issues in the larger group and in small group discussions. Despite the complexities and contradictions of asking people with relatively little to make do with less, a broad-based constituency is essential in building strategic coalitions. Effective strategies will require participation of many people, including Americans who are poor and laborers barely surviving financially. These people must help form strategies, shaping the debate and guiding future steps. Their exclusion would intensify already extreme social and economic inequalities and a growing polarization between those who have more than enough and those who have too little. Some fundamental concerns for future discussion include:
Vernice Miller of the Natural Resources Defense Council pointed out that conference organizers must include thinkers, academicians, scientists and researchers of color, noting that their participation would change and illuminate the discussions. "Our lives [those of whites and people of color] are so fundamentally different that it's almost as if we live on two planets," Miller told those gathered. "We could talk about the same issues and have entirely different interpretations. Consumption and sustainable development are such issues....We all want to get to the same place, and we have got to start speaking to each other."