EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) WRITTEN AND EDITED BY: JOHANNAH BERNSTEIN LANGSTON JAMES GOREE VI "KIMO" RICHARD JORDAN LYNN WAGNER STEVE WISE French translation by MONGI GADHOUM < gad@Tunisia.EU.net> A DAILY REPORT ON THE WORLD SUMMIT FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Vol. 10 No. 40 9 March 1995 WORLD SUMMIT FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS WEDNESDAY, 8 MARCH 1995 MAIN COMMITTEE The Main Committee did not meet Wednesday to allow time for the contact groups to continue their work. WORKING GROUP OF THE MAIN COMMITTEE The Working Group continued its work on the draft commitment on education, completing a first reading after three negotiating sessions. The US suggested combining its proposed (f bis) (enhanced environment for learning) with (c bis) (widening partnerships). Paragraph (f bis) will remain the same, without reference to the Jomtien Declaration, but it will refer to "governments and non-governmental organizations, the private sector, religious groups, and families, in order to achieve the goals of education for all." The US proposed including the reference to the Jomtien Declaration in paragraph (a) (universalization of basic education), and the Syrian Arab Republic agreed. Iran requested brackets around the reference to families, but later accepted the reference. In paragraph (ff) (health education programs for children), Argentina proposed replacing the list of health issues with a reference to comprehensive preventive health programmes. The US, supported by the EU, said that nothing should be listed, but accepted a reference to "special attention to women and girls." Canada requested that the list be kept in brackets. Egypt suggested deleting "Strive to" at the beginning of the paragraph, to conform with other paragraphs. The US and the EU supported Egypt's proposal to refer to a "whole range of health issues as a prerequisite for social development," but the Holy See objected. The Chair noted that the proposal would be accepted where there was agreed language, and that the remainder of the text would be bracketed. In paragraph (g) (achieving goals of national health strategies), the US proposed an amendment calling for the prevention of disability and the spread of diseases. After some debate about whether disability should be "prevented" or "reduced," delegates agreed to "promote nutrition education and prevention programmes." Delegates agreed to a re-ordered paragraph (h)(bis) (health dimensions of policies in all sectors) based on the US explanation that it would highlight the fundamental role that health considerations play in social sector development policies. In paragraph (i) (maternal and child health objectives), several delegates expressed difficulty with the target rates and dates to reduce child and maternal mortality. In paragraph (i)(bis) (addressing HIV/AIDS), the US noted that the paragraph addresses the elimination of discrimination and calls for provision of support services. The Holy See, supported by the US, proposed strengthening the paragraph by adding "every form of" before discrimination. In paragraph (j) (strengthening international organizations), delegates agreed to accept the draft text and to move it to the section on international actions. Delegates agreed on the need for a paragraph addressing environmental education, as proposed by Norway, and they agreed to include the G-77 amendment calling for education about unsustainable patterns of consumption and production. In paragraph (k) (support from international organizations), the G-77 preferred retaining the word "ensure" and deleting the reference to the WHO or UNESCO. The G-77 noted that this paragraph deals with international financial institutions. Canada stated that the word "ensure" had not been used previously in relation to international level actions. The US noted that the objectives addressed in this paragraph are not necessarily included in the mandates of all international organizations. India, supported by the US and Canada, agreed to add "strive to ensure" to the beginning of the paragraph. The EU, supported by Japan, noted that the WHO and UNESCO would be directly affected by this paragraph. Egypt said the thrust of the paragraph is to specify the role of certain international organizations. Benin said that the mandates of UNESCO and the financial institutions are completely different. If this paragraph dealt with only the international financial institutions, then heads of State must provide specific instructions to their representatives on the governing bodies of these institutions regarding assistance to UNESCO and the WHO. The Syrian Arab Republic said that paragraph (m) was the appropriate place for references to WHO and UNESCO. The US withdrew (k bis) (sharing knowledge), noting that he would propose amendments to the similar Canadian paragraph (n) which deals with the same topic. The EU withdrew its objection to paragraph (l), but proposed replacing "preserve common cultural heritage we enjoy" with respect of "our common cultural heritage." The US reserved on "common cultural heritage." The EU, supported by Egypt, noted that humanity's common cultural heritage and diversity must be preserved. The G-77, supported by the EU, the US, the Holy See, and Mali, proposed: "Recognizing the importance of the cultural dimension of development to ensure respect for cultural diversity and that of our common human cultural heritage. Creativity is to be recognized and promoted." In paragraph (m) (UN institutions), the G-77 proposed: "Requests UN institutions and other international organizations dedicated to the promotion of education, culture, and health to give greater emphasis to the overriding goals of eradication of poverty, promotion of full and productive employment, and fostering social integration." The US said this paragraph was similar to (k). He suggested merging these paragraphs or deleting (m). The Syrian Arab Republic said that paragraphs (m) and (k) are different. India, the EU, and the Holy See said this paragraph deals with the three themes of the Summit and that this paragraph is substantially different from paragraph (k), which deals only with this commitment. In paragraph (m bis) (action on HIV/AIDS), the US, supported by Canada and the EU, proposed deleting the word "global." Benin, supported by the Sudan and Egypt, said that the proper place for this reference was is in (l bis), and that all of the diseases mentioned in paragraph 35(d) of the Programme of Action should be mentioned here. Canada proposed "major threats to health." The G-77 objected to any reference to particular programs here. The Chair stated that (i bis) was agreed text and that a small group, consisting of the US, the G-77, and Canada, should discuss this paragraph. In paragraph (n) (sharing knowledge), the EU said that agreement had been reached to delete (k bis) because paragraph (n) was more comprehensive. A new Brazilian text for paragraph (n) had not been circulated. The G-77 said that the two paragraphs should be merged. The Holy See noted that its proposed paragraph (educational health programmes) deals with issues which greatly affect the girl child in education and health. During a night session, the Working Group began a second reading of the draft education commitment. In the new paragraph proposed by the Holy See (educational health programmes), the EU proposed two amendments calling for coordinated international action for education focused on the protection of all children. The US, supported by the Holy See, added a reference to women. Norway preferred the text as introduced. The consensus text called for international support for "educational health programmes, focused on the protection of all women and children, especially against harmful practices such as female genital mutilation and child marriages." The G-77 and the EU proposed a compromise chapeau, which combined most of the elements from each of their original proposals and which included calls for: quality education; access to primary health care; respect for common and particular cultures; people-centered sustainable development; and enhancing the culture of peace. In paragraph (a) (eradication of illiteracy), the EU removed its objection to introducing national languages in the educational system, but suggested that they, "should attempt to attain the same quality standards." The US proposed a reference to the Jomtien Declaration. The EU suggested a reference to "primary education and for illiterates in all communities" after the call for "universalization of basic education." The G-77 called for nations to strive "to attain the highest possible standard of learning." In paragraph (b) (lifelong learning), the EU called for providing the "useful knowledge, reasoning ability, skills and values" required to develop full capacities. Iran objected to the implied elimination of the reference to ethical values, sparking a half-hour debate. The Chair eventually suggested bracketing the reference. During the discussion on paragraph (c) (steps to close the gender gap), the G-77 suggested combining paragraphs (f bis) (exercise of children's rights) and (h) (access to nutrition) and placing them before (c). Paragraph (c) would read: "Take appropriate and affirmative steps to enable all children and adolescents to attend and complete school and to close the gender gap in primary, secondary, vocational and higher education." The Holy See said language referring to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and respect for the rights, duties and responsibilities of parents would not have to be included in (c) if such language were in the combined (f bis)-(h). The US reminded delegates that the second (f bis) (learning acquisition) had been combined with (c bis) (partnerships with the family). IN THE CORRIDORS RICHELLE CONTACT GROUP: Amb. Richelle briefed NGOs on the work of his contact group on chapters II, III, and IV. He said that his characterization of PrepCom III as a "snail applying full brakes while taking a curve" also described the speed of his group here in Copenhagen. The group has made progress on issues related to the family and to unremunerated productive work, but has struggled on issues related to reproductive health and labor standards. Delegates agreed to Cairo language for the family-related issues. On unremunerated work, delegates debated statistical approaches to account for unremunerated work. They finally settled on a combination of various proposals that provide countries with flexibility in developing and applying accounting methods. Developing countries were wary that bracketed language referring to labor standards could be applied against them in trade disputes, while other delegates debated whether bracketed language on national laws and international treaties could be effectively applied. The working group met late into Wednesday night in an attempt to resolve remaining differences. BUTLER CONTACT GROUP: In a briefing for NGOs, Amb. Butler (Australia) characterized his contact group's work (on rights issues) as "trying to cause yesterday's politics to catch up with tomorrow's agenda." He noted that the post- cold war world presented challenges for the implementation of the rights agenda of the Social Summit. Specifically, a new balance between the needs of States and the needs of the international community would have to be established. He said that some states will require assistance with implementation of the Social Summit Programme of Action. However, international assistance must respect the integrity of States. Butler said that the post-cold war world has revealed much misery and unemployment. While a new international agenda is now being defined, the precise relationship between national and international areas of competence has yet to be articulated. Butler added that this question bears on the role of the UN system in promoting people-centered human development. Butler explained that the debates in his contact group had touched on aspects of this new relationship which might seem tangential the issue of social development, but were actually central to implementing the Programme of Action. This was particularly evident in the group's discussions regarding the place of prescriptive language in the text, which to a large extent was driven by the nature of the issue under consideration. THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY PLENARY: The general exchange of views will continue today. The suggested theme is " Productive employment and the reduction of unemployment." WORKING GROUP OF THE MAIN COMMITTEE: The Working Group on the proposed education and health commitment is expected to resume its second reading today. MAIN COMMITTEE: The Main Committee is scheduled to meet at 3:00 pm today. It will consider the texts from the working group on the proposed education commitment and the three informal contact groups. This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin (C) is written and edited by Johannah Bernstein, Langston James Goree VI "Kimo" , Lynn Wagner and Steve Wise with French translation by Mongi Gadhoum . The Sustaining Donors of the Bulletin are the International Institute for Sustainable Development (iisd@web.apc.org), the United Nations Environment Programme and the Pew Charitable Trusts. General support for the Bulletin during 1995 is provided by the United Kingdom, Denmark, Switzerland and the World Bank. Funding for the Bulletin at the Social Summit has been provided by UNDP and UNICEF and ACCT. Special thanks to macKeenzie Copy Center for photocopying services and Dknet for our Internet feed. The authors can be contacted at their electronic mail addresses and by cellular phone during this meeting at +45 401 38818 or 331 47797. The opinions expressed in Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IISD and other funders. Excerpts from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in other publications with appropriate citation only. Electronic versions of the Bulletin can be found on the Internet at and in through the Linkages World Wide Web server at . This volume of the Bulletin is uploaded into the APC conferences and . The Earth Negotiations Bulletin may not be reproduced, reprinted or posted to any system or service outside of the APC networks and the ENB listserver, without specific permission from the International Institute for Sustainable Development. This limitation includes distribution via Usenet News, bulletin board systems, mailing lists, print media and broadcast. For more information, send a message to .