ENB:05:12
[
Next] .
[
Previous] .
[
Contents]
EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21 AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL
The Secretariat's document on this agenda item, E/CN.17/1993/6,
said that experience gained from the UNCED process showed that the
one-year period provided for preparation of national reports based
on suggested guidelines was insufficient. Format and size varied,
and it was hard to extract information and maintain uniformity in
the analysis. The Secretary-General recommended that it would be
useful for governments to follow some standardized format in
preparing their reports/communications for the Commission,
including: they must be in one of the official UN languages, not
exceed 50 pages, refer to specific facts and data that would
reflect improvements or degradation of situations, and be submitted
to the Secretariat at least three months prior to the start of the
CSD session.
During the discussion on this subject delegates raised a number of
concerns about government reporting. Many developing countries were
concerned that information provided by the governments should be
voluntary and the Secretariat should not set guidelines or a
standardized format for these reports. Australia and the Nordics
believed that the national reports should be limited to the
clusters of the multi-year programme of work being discussed at
each session and should be as brief and concise as possible. The
final paragraphs relating to government reporting state: it is up
to individual Governments to decide on the degree of detail and
regularity of their reporting to the CSD, however, the information
provided should be relevant to the Agenda 21 clusters to be
discussed that year; it should be concise (no more than 50 pages);
and it should be accompanied by an executive summary of no more
than 5 pages. To ensure a more focussed and coherent analysis of
the information received by Governments, the Commission agreed on
the need for the Secretary-General to prepare reports using a
standardized format, "which Governments may wish to follow," taking
into account the format of Agenda 21. Finally, Governments are
encouraged to submit their information not less than 6 months prior
to the Commission's session and, to facilitate the work of the
Secretariat, Governments are encouraged to notify the
Secretary-General of a point of contact that has knowledge of the
information provided.
Paragraph 7 of the final document (E/CN.17/1993/L.3/ Rev.1) lists
13 guidelines that the Secretariat should follow on preparing the
information to be included in the analysis of information received
from Governments. Debate on this paragraph focussed on the question
of whether Governments will be required to follow these guidelines
or if they are only for the Secretariat. There were also a number
of specific comments on the guidelines. The compromise text reads:
"Governments, in providing information to the Secretariat, are
encouraged to take into account the above guidelines, in order,
inter alia, to facilitate the task of the Secretariat." The
13 guidelines include:
- Policies and measures adopted at the national level to meet objectives of Agenda 21;
- Institutional mechanisms to addresses sustainable development issues, including the participation of NGOs and major groups;
- Assessments of progress achieved to date;
- Measures taken, including indicators, and progress achieved to reach sustainable production and consumption patterns and lifestyles to combat poverty and limit the demographic impact on the life-supporting capacity of the planet;
- Impact of environmental measures undertaken on the national economy;
- Experience gained (descriptions of successful policies/projects that can serve as models);
- Specific problems and constraints encountered;
- Adverse impact on sustainable development of trade restrictive and distortive policies and measures;
- Assessments of needs and priorities for external assistance in terms of finance, technology transfer, cooperation and capacity-building and human resource development;
- Implementation of Agenda 21 commitments related to finance;
- Assessments of the effectiveness of activities and projects of international organizations; and
- Other relevant environment and development issues, including those affecting youth, women and other major groups.
Paragraphs 9 and 10 of L.3/Rev.1 address the issues of Secretariat
reports for future sessions of the CSD. A lengthy discussion ensued
during which questions were raised about the number of reports the
Secretariat was being asked to prepare and the guidelines or
restrictions being proposed. Egypt suggested that the Secretariat
prepare only one report, whereas the EC said it was essential to
have an overview report and thematic reports relating to the
programme of work. India proposed a compromise that reflected
concerns about the analytical and substantive nature of the reports
as well as the need for separate reports. A number of countries
also proposed amendments to the guidelines. The final formulation
requests the Secretariat to prepare: (1) an annual overview report
on progress made in the implementation of Agenda 21, which should
focus on the cross-sectoral components of Agenda 21 and the
critical elements of sustainability; and (2) thematic reports,
corresponding to the Agenda 21 sectoral clusters to be included on
the agendas of forthcoming sessions of the Commission, in
accordance with the multi-year programme of work. This second
report should include the following:
- Progress achieved to date in the implementation of the objectives of relevant chapters of Agenda 21;
- The main activities that countries are undertaking or planning in order to achieve those objectives;
- Assessments of developments in capacity-building;
- Specific problems and constraints encountered by Governments at all levels;
- Assessments of the availability of domestic human, technological and financial resources and of needs and priorities for external assistance; and
- Assessments of specific expectations from international organizations, financial institutions and funding mechanisms.
Paragraph 11 addresses two issues: sharing of local, national,
subregional and regional experiences on the implementation of
Agenda 21; and the elaboration of realistic, usable and easily
understandable indicators to provide a basis for assessment of
progress towards sustainable development. When one delegate
commented that this paragraph was not clear, the Chair of Informal
Negotiating Group I, Ghazi Jomaa, responded that this is consensus
language, which is not always clear, but the Secretary-General has
a large bureaucracy and they are certain to understand what this
paragraph means.
[Return to start of article]