See more coverage of this event on the main IISD ENB website
We have launched a new website to better share our reports of global environmental negotiations.
As well as current coverage of new negotiations, you can find our original reports from this event by clicking here.
|
||
The EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC) presented language resulting from informal consultations on the mutual supportiveness between the Biosafety Protocol and the relevant WTO agreements. |
||
ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING: | ||
Contact group Co-Chairs Alwin Kopse (Switzerland) and Brendan Tobin (Peru) (right) highlighted work on issues related to derivatives, the appendices, user and provider responsibilities, intellectual property rights (IPR), use of terms and other issues. |
||
|
||
In the afternoon, Co-Chair Kopse (right) presented a corrigendum to CRP.6. He highlighted amendments, including: the mandate of the Working Group on ABS to additionally address capacity-building needs and consider reports; an invitation to governments and organizations to submit information on the use of terms, other approaches, measures to support compliance with PIC and MATs and capacity-building needs; and other textual changes. |
||
Cameroon, on behalf of the AFRICAN GROUP,
called for negotiations on a legally binding instrument on ABS. |
||
|
||
CONTRIBUTION
TO THE TEN-YEAR REVIEW OF AGENDA 21: |
||
On involving national focal points and NGOs in the WSSD process, INDONESIA proposed additional language on government initiatives for involving different stakeholders, while deleting reference to NGOs. | ||
|
||
AUSTRALIA, clarified reference to the Cartagena Protocol and opposed the idea of mandating harmonization between multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) and other international agreements. | ||
CONTACT GROUP: FOREST BIODIVERSITY | ||
Chair Alfred Oteng-Yeboah (Ghana) convened contact group meetings in the afternoon and evening. Some delegates advocated developing a specific format for reporting on forest biodiversity, while others emphasized reporting through existing national reports. |
||
The
need for particular attention to certain types of forests was debated at
length, with delegates agreeing on urgent action for forests that are "ecologically
significant and/or most important for biological diversity on national and
regional scales and according to national priorities" as well as areas
subject to "loss or threats of loss" of forest biodiversity. |
||
ENB SNAPSHOTS: | ||
Links: The
CBD home page COP-6
Provisional Agenda |PDF|WORD| |
|
|| Back to Linkages home || Visit
IISDnet || Send
e-mail to ENB ||
©
2002, IISD. All rights reserved.